Legal Opinion
Ibarzabal v. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 17, 2009No. 07-5687-cvPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
The plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their putative class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of this case, and the issues on appeal.
The district court correctly concluded that the plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., which ordinarily provides the exclusive remedy for parties seeking to challenge an arbitral award or the process that led to that award. See Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- George Corey, Trust Fund v. New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Margaret Neeff v. Emery Transportation Company (An Ohio Corporation) and Midwest Transfer Company of Illinois (An Illinois Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- Borgos-Taboas v. Hima San Pablo Hospital BayamonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- Ungerland v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.Connecticut Superior Court · 2010
- Carter v. MaxwellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Carter v. ShepardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Elliott v. DoneganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020