Legal Opinion

(PC) Alejandro v. Huizare

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 14, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00230Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AREVALO JESUS ALEJANDRO, No. 2:21-CV-0230-TLN-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 HUIZARE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion to dismiss, ECF No. 38. 19 In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of 20 material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 93-94

(2007). The 21…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API