Legal Opinion

State v. Valinski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 6, 2001No. AC 17466PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

This case returns to the AppeUate Court on remand from our Supreme Court for resolution of the remaining claims of the defendant, Stanley T. Valin-ski. See State v. Valinski, 254 Conn. 107, 756 A.2d 1250 (2000). The remaining claims pertain to the defendant’s conviction under General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 14-215 (c) and are (1) whether the state’s evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict of guilty, (2) *579whether the prosecutor’s representation to the jury that she would call a particular witness, but whom she did not call, deprived the defendant of his right to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AbrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. State v. GuadalupeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. State v. PareConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API