Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Monette State Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1964No. 5-3261PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arthur G. Frankel, Special Associate Justice.

The appellee, Monette State Bank, a domestic banking corporation, instituted suit for declaratory judgment to interpret Acts 190 of 1961 and 544 of 1963. The appellants are the State Bank Commissioner and the State Banking Board. Briefs were filed by the parties and amicus curiae and the case heard orally.

The facts are clear and undisputed. During 1937, appellee was granted a domestic banking charter and commenced business in Monette. Appellee was then given permission by the State Banking Board to open a teller’s window in Caraway under the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shields v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Leep v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. State Use Crawfordsville Special School District v. HuxtableSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Dover v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Holland v. NakdimenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arkansas Bank & Trust Co. v. DouglassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Arkansas Bank & Trust Co. v. DouglassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API