Legal Opinion

State Use Crawfordsville Special School District v. Huxtable

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). In the first place, it is contended by (counsel for the Crittenden County Bank and the Bank 'of Crittenden County that there was no liability on their part. The Bank of Crittenden County was organized for the purpose of purchasing the assets and assuming the liabilities of the Crittenden County Bank, which had become insolvent. The contract for the purchase of the assets and the assumption of the liabilities of the Crittenden County Bank was made on February 5, 1927. It is sought to hold both of these banks liable upon the theory that the Crittenden…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Smythe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Town of Cameron v. HicksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HannebrinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Krumpen v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Simpson v. Monette State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. National Surety Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Taylor v. Jonesboro Trust CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API