Legal Opinion
Artichoke Joe's California Grand Casino v. Norton
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 6, 2003No. CIV-S-01-1530 DFL/GGPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
LEVI, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff card rooms and charities (“plaintiffs”) bring suit against the Secretary of the Interior and the Pacific Regional Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (collectively, “Secretary”). The City of San Pablo (“City”) and the Lytton Ranche-ría of California (“Lytton” or “the Lyt-tons”) are defendants in intervention. Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction to prevent the Secretary from taking certain land into trust for Lytton located in San Pablo, California. Plaintiffs contend that Lytton’s plan to conduct class II tribal gaming on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hodgers-Durgin v. De La VinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Sammartano v. First Judicial District Court, in and for the County of Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- North County Community Alliance, Inc. v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Ingrassia v. Chicken Ranch Bingo and CasinoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- County of Amador v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Cedar Hill Manor, L.L.C. v. Department of Social Services, Division of Medical ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- NEIGHBORS OF CASINO SAN PABLO v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.