Legal Opinion
United States v. 103 Electronic Gambling Devices
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2000No. 1091PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
223 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2000)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
103 ELECTRONIC GAMBLING DEVICES, Located at the Red Fox Casino, Laytonville Rancheria, Mendocino County, California, Defendant, CAHTO TRIBE, SHODAKI COYOTEVALLEY CASINO; GENEVIEVE CAMPBELL; SHARP IMAGE GAMING, INC., Claimants, MULTIMEDIA GAMES, INC., Claimant-Appellee.
Office of the Circuit Executive
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Argued and Submitted June 14, 2000--San Francisco, California
Filed August 29, 2000
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Stephen C. Lewis, Catherine J. Depew, Special Assistant United…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. 162 MegaMania Gambling DevicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians v. United States Attorney for the Western District of MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002