Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. Wilson
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.
— This case is here for the second time. See Louisville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Wilson, 119 Ind. 352.
Upon a return of the case to the court below, the appellees filed an amended complaint consisting of seven paragraphs. There was a verdict against the appellees on the first, second and third paragraphs of the complaint, so they need no further notice. The appellant contends that the superior court erred—
*519First. In overruling its demurrer to t}ie fifth, sixth and seventh paragraphs of the complaint.
Second. In overruling its motion for a new trial.
The fifth paragraph of the complaint alleges,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Chicago, Vermilion & Wilmington Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. People ex rel. KoernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. PattisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State ex rel. Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. WolcottIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Birmingham Water Works Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Murray v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.