Legal Opinion

The People v. Pearson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1960No. 35126PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Schaefer

The defendant, Curtis Pearson, was indicted upon charges of rape and robbery, and pleaded not guilty to each indictment. The rape case was tried first. The jury found him guilty and fixed the term of his imprisonment at ten years. He then changed his plea to the robbery charge to one of guilty and was sentenced to a concurrent term of not less than ten nor more than twenty years. By this single writ of error, he seeks to review both judgments of conviction. No objection has been made to proceeding in this manner. The records in both cases are before us, and the alleged error in each case has…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. The People v. HerbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. LamphearIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. The People v. GrizzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hoge v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. The People v. NichollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. The People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. FarnsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API