Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the U. S. v. Gordy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1958No. 5-1452PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam RobiNson, Associate Justice.

The issues here are whether the trial court erred in allowing an attorney’s fee and 12 per cent penalty, as provided by statute-(Ark. Stat. § 66-514) where the plaintiff recovered on the disability feature of three policies of insurance, and whether the attorney’s fee allowed is excessive.

During the years 1916 and 1917, the appellant insurance company issued to appellee, Victory G. Gordy, three policies of insurance, each providing, among other things, $100 per year disability benefits to the insured in the event he became totally and permanently disabled under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Desoto Life Insurance Co. v. JeffettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. National Fire Insurance v. KightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Great Southern Fire Insurance v. Burns & BillingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Life & Casualty Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Broadaway v. the Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Running M Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Federal Life & Casualty Co. v. WeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Miller's Mutual Insurance v. Keith Smith Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Running M Farms, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. VardamanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API