Legal Opinion

Coplen v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1989No. CR 88-126PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The trial court denied the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and other post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Harry Copien was convicted of two counts of battery involving the young children of his girlfriend. He originally advised his attorney to appeal his conviction, but he changed his mind. After the time for filing the record had passed, he changed his mind again and decided to appeal. He filed a motion for rule on clerk and two motions for a belated appeal, which we denied.

Copien now attempts, by use of a postconviction relief petition, to obtain a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Neff v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. George v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Malone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MacKey v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. HerredSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Ricky Roberts v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
  5. Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API