Johnson v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Edith Johnson appealed from a district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) order dismissing her claim for benefits from Workforce Safety and Insurance (‘WSI”). Johnson argues the ALJ improperly set aside the parties’ stipulated specification of issues and abused its discretion by dismissing her claim for benefits as a sane*470tion for failing to comply with discovery. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In 2009, Johnson’s employer, Bremer Bank, filed a first report of injury with WSI for Johnson, claiming Johnson suffered from post-traumatic stress…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Lawrence v. LawrenceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Saakian v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Martinson v. MartinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Le Pire v. Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Annexation of a Part of Lewis & Clark Public Sch. Dist.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- WSI v. Cherokee Services GroupNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Johnson v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012