Legal Opinion
Tabet v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1966No. 7711PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
This is an action for damages agaizist Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc. for breach of lease contract and; by second cause of action, against James I. Grandy and Brooks Nash for their tortious interference with the contract. Issue was joined and by counterclaim Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc. sought a termination of the contract. From a judgment in favor of the defendants on the issue of damages, but denying the counter-claim of Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc. for termination of the lease, all parties have appealed.
On February 18, 1955, the plaintiffs leased a store building and appurtenances thereto…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Lippman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Carter v. AdlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hutchison v. BoneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Stranczek v. BurchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Archuleta v. PinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Williamson v. Piggly Wiggly Shop Rite Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Francis v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Merchant v. WorleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.