Legal Opinion
In Re Dependency of Dm
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 20, 2006No. 33611-1-II, 33621-9-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
149 P.3d 433 (2006)
In re the DEPENDENCY OF DM & SR.
Janice M. and Charles B., Appellant,
v.
Department of Social & Health Services, Respondent.
Nos. 33611-1-II, 33621-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
December 20, 2006.
Manek R. Mistry, Jodi R. Backlund, Backlund & Mistry, Olympia, WA, for Appellant.
Stephen H. Hassett, Office of the Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.
OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART
HUNT, J.
¶ 1 Janice M. and Charles B.[1] appeal superior court orders vacating their non-parental custody of children SR and DM. They argue that (1) because they were de facto parents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- C.E.W. v. D.E.W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- In Re Dependency of JWHWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Blume v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- R.B. v. C.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Sunderland v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- In Re The Welfare Of T.a.w.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015