Legal Opinion
Martin v. Boeing-Oak Ridge Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided December 12, 2002No. 3:01-cv-00113PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JORDAN, District Judge.
This civil action is before the court for consideration of the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant, Boeing-Oak Ridge Company, [doc. 14]. Plaintiff has responded in opposition to the motion [doc. 18, 19], and defendant has submitted a reply [doc. 22], Plaintiff has filed this action for alleged violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; and The Tennessee Human Rights Act (“THRA”), Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-21-101, et seq. 1 For the reasons stated herein, the motion will be…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Donna Mullins v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Santana v. U.S. Tsubaki, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Conner v. City of Jackson, Tenn.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
- Fox v. Yates Services, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Hullom v. City of Jackson, Tenn.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.