Legal Opinion
Dyform Concrete (Prestressed) Ltd. v. Spiroll Corp. Ltd.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 2, 1973No. 4-73-Civ. 102PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LARSON, Chief Judge.
In this action plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that plaintiff and its customers are not guilty of infringement of patents held by defendant. The patents in question cover concrete extrusion machines manufactured by defendant.
Before the Court is a motion of defendant to dismiss this action on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and insufficient service of process.
The first issue presented by the instant motion is whether, on the facts before the Court, there exists a case of actual controversy between the parties sufficient to bestow jurisdiction upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Owatonna Manufacturing Company v. Melroe CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Solenoid Devices, Inc. v. Ledex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- American Needle & Novelty Co. v. Schuessler Knitting Mills, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Solenoid Devices, Inc. v. Ledex, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nova Biomedical Corporation v. Willi Moller, D/b/a/ Gebruder Moller GlasblasereiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Zumbro, Inc. v. California Natural ProductsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbHDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Furmanite America, Inc. v. Durango Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.