Legal Opinion
Beitman v. Strater
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 31, 1917No. 377PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. Suit by Albert B. Beitman against J. Edward Strater.
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
Complainant, Albert B. Beit-man, in his bill alleges that he is the owner of letters patent No. 993,-816, dated May 30, 1911, and charges infringement thereof by the defendant. The answer denies infringement, and avers that the construction described in complainant’s patent has been described and patented in certain letters patent of the United States, a list of which is given in the answer, and also avers that, prior to the complainant’s alleged invention and discovery, said invention was known to and used by certain persons, whose names and addresses are given,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Outlook Co. v. Malco Products Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924