Blick v. Marks, Stokes and Harrison
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtCompton, J.
This appeal of a judgment entered on a promissory note in favor of a law partnership against two clients has been limited to consideration of one issue. Code § 16.1-69.12(c) provides that substitute judges of courts not of record “shall not appear as counsel in any civil or criminal case arising out of the circumstances which were involved in any other case brought before them.” The question presented is whether a violation of this statute renders void and unenforceable a contract between the law firm and the clients for services rendered.
In 1975, an ex parte order was entered in the Hopewell…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Massie v. DudleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- F. S. Bowen Electric Co. v. FoleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Rohanna v. VazzanaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Niemeyer v. WrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Cohen v. MAYFLOWER COPR.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- P. M. Palumbo, Jr., M.D., Inc. v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Blake Construction Co. v. Upper Occoquan Sewage AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Autonation Direct. Com, Inc. v. Thomas A. Moorehead, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Eure v. Jefferson National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Townes Telecomms., Inc. v. Nat'l Telecomms. Coop. Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.