Legal Opinion
H. J. Heinz Co. v. Owens
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 14, 1951No. 12655PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
On motion for summary judgment, the district court dismissed appellant’s amended complaint which sought first a declaration that a patent of appellee was either invalid or not infringed by appellant’s structures and second, an injunction to restrain certain proceedings involving the patent in the Superior Court of the State of California. This appeal followed.
The complaint and documents supporting the motion for summary judgment were before the district court. They reveal the theory and circumstances of this action and the history of prior litigation between the parties.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hill v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Studebaker Corporation v. Richard D. GittlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Leroy JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. RodenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff v. Linda Ann DigregorioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.