Legal Opinion
Golder v. City of Saco
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 12, 2012No. Yor-11-423PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] This appeal arises from the City of Saco’s approval of a contract zoning agreement for property purchased by Estates at Bay View, LLC. Joel Golder and other nearby property owners (collectively, the Neighbors) filed a five-count complaint in the Superior Court challenging the legality of the contract zoning agreement and the Saco Planning Board’s subsequent approval of a subdivision and site plan for the property. The Neighbors now appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) granting the City’s motion to dismiss three of the counts, granting summary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Beneficial Maine Inc. v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Adelman v. Town of BaldwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- LaBonta v. City of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Crispin v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Levesque v. Androscoggin CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Charles Remmel v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. City of S. PortlandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2017
- Yankee Pride Transportation and Logistics, Inc. v. UIG, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Jeffrey Stoops v. Richard NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.