Legal Opinion

Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. City of S. Portland

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 29, 2017No. 2:15–cv–00054–JAWPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

A pipeline operator challenges a local ordinance prohibiting loading crude oil onto tankers and new structures for that purpose on the grounds that it is preempted under numerous federal and state laws, that it violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, that it violates the business's civil rights, its due process rights, its right to avoid improper delegation, its right to equal protection under the law, and that it violates the City's own comprehensive plan.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment…

2Cases cited154 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. City of So. PortlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  2. MAINE WINDJAMMERS INC v. SEA3 LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  3. Manhart, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Lititz Mutual Insurance CompanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2021
  4. Manhart, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Lititz Mutual Insurance CompanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2021
  5. OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. CALPERS CORPORATE PARTNERS LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API