Legal Opinion
State v. Wicklund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 7, 1998No. C7-97-1381PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.
This appeal is from a pretrial order denying respondents’ motion to dismiss but ruling in respondents’ favor on the legal issue of whether the Mall of America is a “public forum” for purposes of the free speech provision of the Minnesota Constitution. Respondents are charged with misdemeanor trespassing. Minn.Stat. § 609.605, subd. 1 (1996). We reverse.
FACTS
Respondents Freeman Wicklund, Althea Schaffer, Peter Eckholdt, and Alissa Eggert are charged with entering the Mall of America on May 19, 1996, as part of a group of about 10 people protesting on behalf of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robb v. HungerbeelerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Thomas Robb v. Henry HungerbeelerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Chenoweth v. City of New BrightonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Chenoweth v. City of New BrightonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Moonbeam Capital Investments, LLC v. Integrated Construction Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020