Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Goodwin-Hill Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 3, 1946No. 220PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The defendant appeals from a judgment awarding the plaintiff a commission, earned as its broker or sales agent, for procuring a contract between it and the United States Army Engineering Corps. The only defence is that, since the' commission was concededly contingent upon the plaintiff’s success in procuring the contract, it was for that reason illegal within such decisions as Tool Co. v. Norris, 2 Wall. 45, 17 L.Ed. 868; Oscanyan v. Arms Co., 103 U.S. 261, 26 L.Ed. 539; and Hazelton v. Sheckels, 202 U.S. 71, 26 S.Ct. 567, 50 L.Ed. 939, 6 Ann.Cas. 217. The cáse was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Le John Manufacturing Company v. Dwight Webb, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. Bradley v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. United States v. Paddock. In Re Globe Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  4. Bradley v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  5. Weitzel v. Brown-Neil CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API