Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 12, 1928No. 159PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

The Goodyear Company brought this action under the Tucker Act, 1 to recover rent claimed under a lease to the United States. The petition was dismissed, on demurrer, for failure to state a cause of action. 62 Ct. Cls. 370.

The facts alleged were these: In October, 1921, the predecessor of the Goodyear Company leased to the United States, for the use of the Veterans’ Bureau, certain premises in Cincinnati, Ohio, for a term ending June 30, 1926, at a stipulated annual rental payable in monthly instalments. No appropriation was then available for payment of the rent after the first fiscal year,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. Minnesota Mutual Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Leiter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Elmer J. Benes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  5. Onilea Neal v. Robert BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API