Legal Opinion

P. G. Peurifoy v. G. W. Wiebusch

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1938No. 7083PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge Smedley

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

The suit, which was filed by defendant in error Wiebusch, Nathan Powell and wife and Powell University Training School as plaintiffs against G. W. Thomason as defendant, and in which plaintiff in error Peurifoy intervened, is for the title and possession of six town lots in University Annex, an addition to the City of Dallas. After peremptorily instructing the jury, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of Wiebusch individually and as trustee against Thomason and Peurifoy for the title and possession…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Dallas Joint Stock Land BankTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lyons-Thomas Hardware Co. v. Perry Stove Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Aransas Pass Harbor Co. v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. National Bank v. Texas Investment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Rackley v. FowlkesTexas Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Courseview, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BlankenburgTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. G. C. Nunn, Receiver, Horace Smith, Fred Nemerovski and Harry Ballis v. Robert L. FeltintonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API