Legal Opinion

People v. Gauthier

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1970No. Docket 8,794PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

This case requires an interpretation of the right of confrontation guaranteed to criminal defendants by Const 1963, art 1, § 20, 1 as well as by virtue of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 2 At issue is the scope of the confrontation right in criminal cases when read in light of a recognized exception to the hearsay rule — specifically, the business records hearsay exception. 3

We acknowledge at the outset that People v. Lewis (1940), 294 Mich 684, stands firmly against the admission of business record hearsay in criminal cases, the statutory exception notwithstanding. In…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API