Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Noreen Thompson (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision to grant her claim petition. However, both the WCJ and the Board denied Claimant’s request for quantum meruit attorney’s fees for unreasonable contest. It was the position of Claimant’s employer that her accident did not occur on its premises and, therefore, did not occur in the scope of her employment. The Board concluded that the employer’s contest was a reasonable one. We affirm.
Cinema…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Majesky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Esssroc Materials v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Markle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bucknell University)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- United States Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- ICT Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- PPL v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- O'Rourke v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth Dept. of Transportation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.