Legal Opinion

State v. Redd

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 31, 1988No. 19260-4-I; 19521-2-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, C.J.

David Irwin Redd and Albert Earl Blackshear appeal their convictions for possession of controlled substances with intent to deliver or manufacture.

Facts

Blackshear and Redd were charged together with one count of possession of cocaine and heroin with intent to deliver or manufacture (count 1). Blackshear was charged separately with two additional counts of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver or manufacture (counts 2 and 3). Redd was also charged separately with one count of simple possession of cocaine (count 4).

On June 3, 1986, the case was assigned to trial before the Honorable…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. State v. SaltarelliWashington Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. State v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API