Legal Opinion

Kircher v. City of Ypsilanti

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 2006No. Docket 256478PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition to defendant city of Ypsilanti and the resulting dismissal of plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff owns several rental properties that are located in the city of Ypsilanti and, thus, are subject to defendant’s ordinances governing inspection and certificates of compliance. Plaintiff asserts that defendant, through its application of those ordinances, is in the practice of violating its own ordinances, state law, and his constitutional rights. The trial court disagreed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jackson County v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Dawson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. English Gardens Condominium, LLC v. Howell TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Trantham v. State Disbursement UnitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Wolf v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API