Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Bright

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1923No. 17861PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The question for determination in this controversy is the construction to be given Section 7623, General Code, especially paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 thereof, which are as follows:

“5. When both labor and materials are embraced in the work bid for, each must be separately .stated in the bid, with the price thereof.
“6. None but the lowest responsible bid shall be accepted. The board in its discretion may reject all the bids, or accept any bid for both labor and material for such improvement or repair, which is the lowest in the aggregate.
“7. Any part of a hid which is lower than the same part of any…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Elliott Co. v. ConnarOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of New Albany v. LemonIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Verberg v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lopez v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API