Legal Opinion

Dostal v. Baltimore & O. R.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 29, 1948No. 9664PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.

This is a diversity suit, arising out of the death of Joseph A. Dostal when an automobile which he was operating collided with a passenger train of defendant at a grade crossing near Lyndora, Pa.

The case was tried before a jury. The testimony was largely directed to two questions : whether defendant was negligent, and whether Dostal was contributorily negligent. After both sides had rested, defendant moved for a directed verdict. The motion was denied.

Being unable to agree, the jury was discharged. Then, relying upon Rule 50 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. AgneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. DeWaele v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. MalmskoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Florini v. StegnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  5. Ritter v. Wyoga Gas & Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  2. Price v. Inland Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Kanatser v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Gore v. HansenSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. Allen E. Northern, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API