Legal Opinion

Price v. Inland Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 20, 1981No. 80-1764PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

This case arises from an unfortunate accident at the Hanover Wire Cloth Company on February 10, 1975. On that date, a Hanover employee, Tyrone Price, was seriously burned when his clothing, having been splashed with a flammable hydrocarbon substance known as “naphtha” or “mineral spirits,” accidentally became ignited by a cigarette spark. Price brought suit against the supplier of the naphtha, appellant, Amsco, Division of Union Oil Company of California (“Amsco”), on both a negligence and strict liability theory.1 During pre-trial…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Knight v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API