Legal Opinion
Kanatser v. Chrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1952No. 4360PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
Ruth Kanatser instituted this action •against The Chrysler Corporation to recover damages arising out of an automobile accident. The cause was'tried to a jury and a verdict was returned for plaintiff. Defendant seasonably filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and in the alternative for a new trial. Exces-siveness of the verdict was not a ground of the motion for new trial. The motion was silent in respect to the verdict being excessive in amount. At a hearing on the motion held approximately seven months after its filing the court indicated that in its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc. v. CashmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Breeding Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Delano v. KitchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Kanatser v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation v. Jessie W. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Citizens National Bank of Lubbock v. John E. Speer, Trustee in Bankruptcy of C. M. Henderson BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- J. Norman 'Stoney' Stone v. The Honorable Wyoming Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.