Legal Opinion
Appeal of Campaign for Ratepayers Rights
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 1, 1990No. 89-336PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
Campaign for Ratepayers Rights (CRR) appeals from an order of the Nuclear Decommissioning Finance Com*481mittee (committee) establishing a schedule of payments which will eventually fund the decommissioning of the Seabrook nuclear power plant. In particular, the CRR claims that certain findings made by the committee were unsupported by the evidence and that CRR’s due process rights guaranteed by the State and Federal Constitutions were violated because an employee of Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH) was acting as a committee member. For the following reasons, we affirm.
On May 4,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Appeal of Conservation Law Foundation of New England, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Atherton v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
- Appeal of PeirceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Thomson v. State Board of ParoleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Appeal of Seacoast Anti-Pollution LeagueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Appeal of Osram Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- In re HustonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Appeal of Campaign for Ratepayers' RightsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Appeal of DumontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Appeal of Keith R. Mader 2000 Revocable Trust & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021