Back v. Hook
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
By the instant action, plaintiffs seek damages on account of defendant’s failure to convey to them a parcel of real property.
It was alleged in paragraph I of plaintiffs’ complaint that on or about August 5, 1947, they entered into a written agreement with defendant to purchase the realty upon certain terms and conditions.
Paragraph III of the complaint alleged that this agreement was modified by a subsequent contract between the parties on April 30, 1948, under the terms of which plaintiffs were to receive certain credits toward the monthly payments required under the agreement of August 5,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Ortega v. CorderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re the Estate of DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Burnett v. StearnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woodland Hills Homeowners Organization v. Los Angeles Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Fitzsimmons v. JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Mullen v. GrossArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Sande v. SandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969