Valora v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE.
We granted review in this healthcare subrogation matter to determine whether its resolution should be guided exclusively by the contractual provisions of the Pennsylvania State Police Handbook, which conferred upon appellant Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund (“PEBTF”) a right of subrogation against a subscriber’s recovery from a third party of healthcare expenses paid by appellant, or whether principles of equitable subrogation also play a role in the analysis. The Superior Court, in its dealing with the matter below, applied principles of equitable subrogation…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Jacobs v. Northeastern Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Tire Jockey Service, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Daley-Sand v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- TeleTracking v. Gori, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- TeleTracking v. Gori, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.