Legal Opinion
Sexton v. Johnson Suburban Utilities, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1981No. 2-1180A387PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
Joseph F. Sexton d/b/a Valle Vista Ar-mes and Valle Vista Associates, Ltd. (Sexton) appeals the dismissal of his complaint by the Public Service Commission of Indiana (PSC).
We affirm.
Sexton argues three issues:(1) PSC abused its discretion in striking Sexton’s complaint;(2) The Court of Appeals has the power to grant emergency relief and alter, amend, or suspend a utility’s rates and charges when the PSC has abused its discretion in denying that relief;(3) The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to grant emergency equitable relief if Sexton has no standing to raise the question…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- L. S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. IPALCO Et Al.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- County Council, Etc. v. Dept. of Pub. Wel., Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Indiana Forge & MacHine Co. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- County Council of Monroe County v. State Ex Rel. Monroe County Board of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- State ex rel. City of Marion v. Grant Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Cromer v. SeftonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Morrison v. McMahonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bowen Engineering Corp. v. W.P.M. Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.