Legal Opinion

United States v. Doe

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 24, 1992No. 1073, Docket 91-6305PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Intervenor-appellant, referred to as “John Doe,” the president and sole shareholder of a corporation referred to in the present proceedings by the fictitious name “XYZ,” appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Milton Pollack, Judge, ordering Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (“Paul-Weiss”), a law firm representing Doe and formerly representing XYZ, to comply with a grand jury subpoena duces tecum calling for the production of certain XYZ records in Paul-Weiss’s possession. Over objections by Doe and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. James and MallayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Docket No. 02-6239Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. MorelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  5. Salomon Bros. Treasury Litigation v. Steinhardt Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API