BancOhio National Bank v. Rubicon Cadillac, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
Two issues are submitted for resolution in this appeal. The first issue raised is whether Commodity Credit Corporation, an unjoinable party in a state proceeding, is an indispensable party under Civ. R. 19(B). The second issue raised is whether the trial court’s ruling in denying the appellants’ motions to dismiss was a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02 or Civ. R. 54(B).
The question as to whether Commodity Credit Corporation is an indispensable party pursuant to Civ. R. 19(B) was never raised at the appellate level. While this may have been appellants’ intended assignment of error,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Board of Commissioners v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Russell v. Mercy HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Humphry v. Riverside Methodist HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Foran v. Fisher Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Guccione v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Ross v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.