Illinois Cent. R. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
The Safety Appliance Act (Comp. St. §§ 8605, 8614) makes it unlawful for a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce to run any train in such traffic without a sufficient number of the ears thereof being equipped with train brakes, so that the speed can be controlled without the use of hand brakes. An order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, made pursuant to authority vested in it by the same act, requires that 85 per cent, of the cars in any such train shall have their brakes used and operated by the engineer of the train.
This suit was brought by the government…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Erie Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hiatt v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Chicago & E. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
- United States v. Guy A. Thompson, Trustee, Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.