United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
The United States contends that a certain movement of cars in defendant’s yards without cutting in the air constitutes a violation of the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. The defendant, conceding that it is engaged in interstate commerce, contends that the movement was a mere switch movement and hence not in violation of law. The essential facts are not in dispute. íhere were 47 cars in the movement. They were assembled on the so-called macaroni lead track, which runs parallel to the double main line track of the defendant. Generally speaking, this track…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Campbell v. WadsworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Illinois Cent. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Chicago & E. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Guy A. Thompson, Trustee, Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. South Buffalo R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954