Legal Opinion

Gaiser v. Village of Skokie

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1995No. 1—92—0161, 1—92—0192 consPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi

This action was initiated by plaintiff, Eugene Gaiser, in an effort to recover compensation for 241 days of emergency leave benefits allegedly owed to him by defendant, the Village of Skokie (Village). The intervener /third-party plaintiff, the Skokie Police Pension Board (Pension Board), was then granted leave to file an action to recover disability pension payments allegedly paid prematurely to plaintiff in the event that he was successful in his initial complaint against defendant. Subsequently, the trial court dismissed the intervenor/ third-party plaintiff’s complaint on the basis that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Curry v. SummerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Tonchen v. All-Steel Equipment, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Koch v. Illinois Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Roboserve, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation v. Kato Kagaku Company, Limited, a Japanese CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Athanas v. City of Lake ForestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Southwestern Public Service Co. v. Thunder Basin Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Dopkeen v. WhitakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Hanna v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API