Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Marshall Field & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1996No. 1-95-2334PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Following her discharge from employment, plaintiff Dierdre Hanna filed a three-count complaint against her employers, defendants Marshall Field & Company (Marshall Field) and Dayton Hudson Corporation (Dayton Hudson). Plaintiff alleged causes of action premised on breach of contract for defendants’ alleged failure to comply with provisions of certain employee handbooks and personnel policies, false imprisonment and discharge relating to the filing of a worker’s compensation claim. After voluntarily dismissing the worker’s compensation claim, plaintiff now appeals the entry of summary judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Meerbrey v. Marshall Field & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Albright v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gene M. Auston, IV v. Tom SchubnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Driebel v. City Of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Skelton v. American Intercontinental University OnlineDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  4. Martensen v. KochDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  5. Sutula-Johnson v. Office Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API