Legal Opinion
Erwin v. Edwards
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 4, 2001No. 01-3387PublishedCited by 339 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Pro se Ohio prisoner Max R. Erwin, Sr., appeals a district court judgment that dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The case has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).
In 1993, an Ohio jury convicted Erwin of felonious sexual penetration and gross sexual imposition. The court sentenced him to eight to twenty-five years of imprisonment.
In March 2000, Erwin filed the instant § 2254 petition. He challenged an April 1999 state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wells v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marty O'Shea Franklin v. James Rose, Warden of Tennessee State Penitentiary, and State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Elbert W. Williamson v. Christine O. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Robert E. HENRY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Daniel LUNGREN, California State Attorney General, Respondent-Appellant, Wayne Estelle, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by339 opinions
- Eric Martin v. William OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In re McFaddenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Rickmyer v. BrowneDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Spence v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Aaron C. Knapp v. City of Lorain, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.