Legal Opinion

Leeman v. Cote

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 30, 2006No. 055387APublished

1Opinion of the Court

Sikora, Mitchell J., J.

RULING

Upon consideration of the administrative record, all motion and opposition materials, and the arguments of all parties at the hearing of July 24, 2006, the court ALLOWS the motion of plaintiff William Leeman for judgment on the pleadings.

ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

Judgment shall now enter in favor of plaintiff Lee-man as follows. The judgment is declaratory and injunctive.(1) The decision of the defendant Supervisor of Records dated December 2, 2005, denying disclosure of the records of the Haverhill Police Department’s internal affairs is VACATED.(2) The records of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. MATTER OF SWINTON v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Hull Municipal Lighting Plant v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Wakefield Teachers Ass'n v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Oregonian Publishing Co. v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API