Legal Opinion
Brown v. Eubank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 13, 1969No. 17302PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATEMAN, Justice.
Our former opinion is withdrawn and the following substituted for it.
This is a boundary dispute which was submitted to arbitration. The appeal is from a judgment reciting that it is based upon the award of the arbitrators.
The first trial of the case resulted in a judgment establishing the boundary, but this judgment was reversed and remanded. Brown v. Eubank, 378 S.W.2d 707 (Tex.Civ.App., Tyler 1964, writ ref’d n. r. e.). Thereafter, on March 1, 1965, the trial court entered an order, which was also signed by the parties and their attorneys, as follows:
“On this 1st day of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haskell v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Forshey v. G. H. & H. RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Tejas Development Co. v. McGough Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Deep South Oil Co. of Texas v. Texas Gas Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Brown v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Statewide Remodeling, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. Midgard Energy Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- House Grain Co. v. Obst, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
- Riha v. SmulcerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Graham-Rutledge & Co., Inc. v. Nadia Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.