Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Rowe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 5, 1987No. 2 CA-CV 87-0066, 2 CA-CV 87-0067PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of the characterization and disposition of certain property, primarily corporate stock, in connection with the lengthy and acrimonious dissolution of Jack and Patricia Rowe’s marriage. Jack Rowe and Jack Rowe Associates (JRA) are joined together as appellees/cross-appellants and will be referred to collectively as Jack Rowe.

The parties were married on February 26, 1974. In September of 1982, Patricia Rowe petitioned for separation. After a 61-day .trial, that stretched over five months and involved attorneys’ fees and costs…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Myrick v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Boyle v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Marriage of Roden v. RodenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Hefner v. HefnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. Menghini v. MenghiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API