Jackson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PAIR, Senior Judge:
This appeal is from convictions for sodomy, 1 taking indecent liberties with a minor child, 2 and enticing a minor child. 3 Appellant contends that the indictment was insufficient, that the corroboration of the children’s testimony was insufficient, and that he was denied a speedy trial. We find no merit in any of these contentions and, accordingly affirm the judgments of conviction. We do, however, remand with directions to vacate four of the five convictions for taking indecent liberties since they merged with the convictions for sodomy.
The convictions arose from several…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Dixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Gary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lemon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Olafisoye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. MulkeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.