Application of Sanford C. Lyons
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming a double patenting rejection of claims 29-33, the only remaining claims in Lyons’ application serial No. 764,395, filed September 30, 1958 for “Kaolin Product and Process for Making Same.”
From the context of thfe rejection and decision it is clear that the double patenting rejection is of the obviousness type, being based on the claims of appellant’s prior patent:
Claims 29-32 are drawn to a process and claim 33 is to the product of process claim 30. In addition to the double patenting rejection of the product…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Application of Douglas J. BridgefordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Rene De Montmollin and Henri RiatCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of William G. Baird, Jr., Carl A. Lindstrom, Jr., Arthur L. Besse, Jr., and Donald J. D'EntrEmontCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- In re OckertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Bramel v. Utah State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Application of Sanford C. LyonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966