Smith v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action of Tort for deceit in the sale of stock in certain telephone companies. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1917, Chittenden County, Butler, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, J".
The plaintiff brought suit against H. IT. Reynolds, Fred Howes, and several others to recover damages for alleged deceit in the sale of certain stock in the Washington Consolidated Telephone and Telegraph Company. Service was had only upon defendants Howes and Reynolds, and they will be referred to when speaking of the defendants. The trial was by jury with verdict for the plaintiff against both defendants, who made separate and independent defences. They bring the ease here on exceptions, claiming error in the admission and exclusion of certain testimony, in remarks by plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Belka v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Hine v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. StorrsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Cummings v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- State, Use of Miles v. BraininCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Murray v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.